<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Undervaluation and transaction value in customs: appeals allowed after corroboration, payment of differential duty and reduced penalty.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96350</link>
    <description>Appeal concerns undervaluation and transaction value in customs; tribunal addressed admissibility of third-party documents and statements and the burden of proof on revenue to establish under-valuation using contemporaneous imports, finding reliance on common documentary evidence. A partners acceptance of undervaluation and payment of differential duty, interest and reduced penalty under statute was treated as corroborative, and earlier tribunal precedent affirmed by the Supreme Court was applied to the present matters. Consequentially the impugned order was set aside and both appeals were allowed with attendant benefits where applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 07:36:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 07:36:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Undervaluation and transaction value in customs: appeals allowed after corroboration, payment of differential duty and reduced penalty.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96350</link>
      <description>Appeal concerns undervaluation and transaction value in customs; tribunal addressed admissibility of third-party documents and statements and the burden of proof on revenue to establish under-valuation using contemporaneous imports, finding reliance on common documentary evidence. A partners acceptance of undervaluation and payment of differential duty, interest and reduced penalty under statute was treated as corroborative, and earlier tribunal precedent affirmed by the Supreme Court was applied to the present matters. Consequentially the impugned order was set aside and both appeals were allowed with attendant benefits where applicable.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 07:36:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>