<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (4) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49639</link>
    <description>Reassessment notices under the Cochin and Travancore income-tax laws were sustained because the materials showed definite information giving rise to an honest belief that income had escaped assessment. The expression &quot;assessment&quot; in section 13(1) of the Finance Act, 1950, was construed broadly to include reassessment, so the statutory transfer covered the entire process of levy and assessment. The financial agreements with the former Indian States, given constitutional sanctity, did not bar reassessment where the recommendations preserved pending proceedings and the finality of completed matters. The Travancore-Cochin appeals were dismissed, and the Mysore appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 17:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (4) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49639</link>
      <description>Reassessment notices under the Cochin and Travancore income-tax laws were sustained because the materials showed definite information giving rise to an honest belief that income had escaped assessment. The expression &quot;assessment&quot; in section 13(1) of the Finance Act, 1950, was construed broadly to include reassessment, so the statutory transfer covered the entire process of levy and assessment. The financial agreements with the former Indian States, given constitutional sanctity, did not bar reassessment where the recommendations preserved pending proceedings and the finality of completed matters. The Travancore-Cochin appeals were dismissed, and the Mysore appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>