<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1661 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466112</link>
    <description>Section 68 cash-credit scrutiny requires evaluation of the share subscribers&#039; identity, creditworthiness and the genuineness of the transactions on the evidentiary material produced. An adverse inference based solely on directors&#039; non-response to notices is treated as insufficient where the assessing authority has not examined the veracity or admissibility of the documents already on record. A reasoned appellate assessment must address that evidence and demonstrate application of mind; a non-speaking order does not meet this standard. On the stated analysis, the cash-credit addition was set aside and the Revenue&#039;s appeal did not succeed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2026 11:53:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1661 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466112</link>
      <description>Section 68 cash-credit scrutiny requires evaluation of the share subscribers&#039; identity, creditworthiness and the genuineness of the transactions on the evidentiary material produced. An adverse inference based solely on directors&#039; non-response to notices is treated as insufficient where the assessing authority has not examined the veracity or admissibility of the documents already on record. A reasoned appellate assessment must address that evidence and demonstrate application of mind; a non-speaking order does not meet this standard. On the stated analysis, the cash-credit addition was set aside and the Revenue&#039;s appeal did not succeed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>