<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (10) TMI 10 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49628</link>
    <description>A statutory notice under section 34 of the Income-tax Act, 1922 was treated as a condition precedent to reassessment, and notice to the firm as assessee was valid even though the firm had been dissolved; the reassessment proceedings were therefore within jurisdiction. Rule 6B of the Income-tax Rules was also upheld as intra vires because it addressed cancellation of registration where a firm was found never to have been genuine, which was distinct from penal cancellation under the assessment provisions for default by a genuine registered firm. The cancellation of registration was consequently sustained, and both challenges failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 16:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (10) TMI 10 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49628</link>
      <description>A statutory notice under section 34 of the Income-tax Act, 1922 was treated as a condition precedent to reassessment, and notice to the firm as assessee was valid even though the firm had been dissolved; the reassessment proceedings were therefore within jurisdiction. Rule 6B of the Income-tax Rules was also upheld as intra vires because it addressed cancellation of registration where a firm was found never to have been genuine, which was distinct from penal cancellation under the assessment provisions for default by a genuine registered firm. The cancellation of registration was consequently sustained, and both challenges failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>