<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (10) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49626</link>
    <description>Interest credited in mercantile account books may be treated as income received, or treated as received, in British India where the entries represent amounts legally due and the surrounding circumstances support that characterisation. On that basis, the interest entries in the head office books were taxable under section 4(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922. The contention that the entries were only book entries was rejected, and a new argument that a person cannot trade with herself was refused because it had not been raised earlier.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 10:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (10) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49626</link>
      <description>Interest credited in mercantile account books may be treated as income received, or treated as received, in British India where the entries represent amounts legally due and the surrounding circumstances support that characterisation. On that basis, the interest entries in the head office books were taxable under section 4(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922. The contention that the entries were only book entries was rejected, and a new argument that a person cannot trade with herself was refused because it had not been raised earlier.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>