<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1241 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785485</link>
    <description>Classification of imported squid liver/meal powder turned on compositional analysis and the essential character of the mixture: substantial soyabean meal (4050%) rendered the product a preparation used in animal feeding and therefore classifiable under Heading 2309 rather than 2301. Show Cause Notices were held factually and legally sufficient to sustain reclassification and demands. Non-disclosure of soyabean content amounted to suppression of material facts, justifying invocation of the extended limitation period and attendant penal consequences. Penalty for suppression and confiscation for mis-declaration were upheld as statutory consequences, and appeals against these findings were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2026 08:39:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1241 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785485</link>
      <description>Classification of imported squid liver/meal powder turned on compositional analysis and the essential character of the mixture: substantial soyabean meal (4050%) rendered the product a preparation used in animal feeding and therefore classifiable under Heading 2309 rather than 2301. Show Cause Notices were held factually and legally sufficient to sustain reclassification and demands. Non-disclosure of soyabean content amounted to suppression of material facts, justifying invocation of the extended limitation period and attendant penal consequences. Penalty for suppression and confiscation for mis-declaration were upheld as statutory consequences, and appeals against these findings were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>