<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1249 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785493</link>
    <description>Penalty under tax law for non-filing of audit report was contested on the basis that the assessee maintained no accounts, so the statutory audit obligation did not arise. The legal point is that where no books of account are maintained, the requirement to file an audit report under the audit statute is inapplicable, and consequential penalty for non-filing cannot be sustained. On that basis the impugned penalty was set aside and the taxpayer&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2026 08:39:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1249 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785493</link>
      <description>Penalty under tax law for non-filing of audit report was contested on the basis that the assessee maintained no accounts, so the statutory audit obligation did not arise. The legal point is that where no books of account are maintained, the requirement to file an audit report under the audit statute is inapplicable, and consequential penalty for non-filing cannot be sustained. On that basis the impugned penalty was set aside and the taxpayer&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>