<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (10) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49619</link>
    <description>The court upheld the revised assessment order, dismissing the appeal. It concluded that the decision of the Privy Council constituted valid &quot;information&quot; under section 34(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act. The court determined that both conditions for reassessment were satisfied, allowing the Income-tax Officer to reassess the appellant&#039;s income based on the belief that income had escaped assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (10) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49619</link>
      <description>The court upheld the revised assessment order, dismissing the appeal. It concluded that the decision of the Privy Council constituted valid &quot;information&quot; under section 34(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act. The court determined that both conditions for reassessment were satisfied, allowing the Income-tax Officer to reassess the appellant&#039;s income based on the belief that income had escaped assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>