https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466092 Adverse inference for non-production of documents and obligation to render account of overriding commission were central to review of decretal relief; reappreciation of evidence led to disallowance of a claimed portion and modification of the decree, with the remainder ordered to be deposited by the respondent within four weeks with interest at 7% per annum from institution to payment. Previous award of 10% interest on the scaled amount that had been deposited and withdrawn was set aside insofar as the disallowed claim is concerned. The appeal against the disallowed claim was allowed and related appeals set aside. en-us Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Jan 2026 19:18:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466092 Adverse inference for non-production of documents and obligation to render account of overriding commission were central to review of decretal relief; reappreciation of evidence led to disallowance of a claimed portion and modification of the decree, with the remainder ordered to be deposited by the respondent within four weeks with interest at 7% per annum from institution to payment. Previous award of 10% interest on the scaled amount that had been deposited and withdrawn was set aside insofar as the disallowed claim is concerned. The appeal against the disallowed claim was allowed and related appeals set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466092