<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (3) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49604</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed with costs as the court upheld the jurisdiction of the Income-tax Officer (Calcutta) under Section 5(2) of the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized that the determination of the place of assessment is an administrative matter and not subject to appeal. The High Court&#039;s dismissal of the application under Section 66(2) was also upheld, with the court finding no merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (3) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49604</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed with costs as the court upheld the jurisdiction of the Income-tax Officer (Calcutta) under Section 5(2) of the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized that the determination of the place of assessment is an administrative matter and not subject to appeal. The High Court&#039;s dismissal of the application under Section 66(2) was also upheld, with the court finding no merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>