<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1160 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785404</link>
    <description>Levy of service tax on cash calls by co-venturers was examined through joint venture and PPP principles, focusing on characterisation of cash calls as consideration for taxable service versus proportionate contributions toward exploration and development. The analysis emphasises the operator/non-operator distinction under Production Sharing Contracts, the revenue-sharing nature of joint bids and Joint Operating Agreements, and that exploration and development outlays are prospective investments or sunk costs contingent on discovery. Consequently, contributions recovered as shares of such expenses do not constitute consideration for taxable service, and the impugned demand was quashed on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:10:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=880836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1160 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785404</link>
      <description>Levy of service tax on cash calls by co-venturers was examined through joint venture and PPP principles, focusing on characterisation of cash calls as consideration for taxable service versus proportionate contributions toward exploration and development. The analysis emphasises the operator/non-operator distinction under Production Sharing Contracts, the revenue-sharing nature of joint bids and Joint Operating Agreements, and that exploration and development outlays are prospective investments or sunk costs contingent on discovery. Consequently, contributions recovered as shares of such expenses do not constitute consideration for taxable service, and the impugned demand was quashed on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>