https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785408 The note addresses market delineation and competition-law liability concerning the use of Crystalline Durability Admixture in heavy infrastructure projects. The product market as defined is accepted, while the proposed geographic market limited to Maharashtra is rejected and nationwide market delineation upheld, with consequent rejection of a finding of regional dominance. The procurement criterion of IRC accreditation is treated as a permissible eligibility requirement and not unfair or discriminatory. On these factual and legal bases, no abuse of dominance or cartelisation is found, no prima facie case warranted a DG investigation, and the appellate challenge to the Commissions conclusions fails. en-us Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:10:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785408 The note addresses market delineation and competition-law liability concerning the use of Crystalline Durability Admixture in heavy infrastructure projects. The product market as defined is accepted, while the proposed geographic market limited to Maharashtra is rejected and nationwide market delineation upheld, with consequent rejection of a finding of regional dominance. The procurement criterion of IRC accreditation is treated as a permissible eligibility requirement and not unfair or discriminatory. On these factual and legal bases, no abuse of dominance or cartelisation is found, no prima facie case warranted a DG investigation, and the appellate challenge to the Commissions conclusions fails. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785408