<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1166 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785410</link>
    <description>Dispute concerns rectification of the register of members and the effect of limitation where alleged fraudulent share transfers occurred. The discoverability rule under limitation law postpones commencement until the mistake or fraud is discovered or could have been discovered with reasonable diligence; this doctrine was applied to hold that once a party knew antecedent facts enabling legal action, limitation begins, and ongoing awareness from 2006 and actions in 2011 meant limitation had commenced. Reliance on authority clarifying that the postponement does not cover all frauds or concealments that do not suppress knowledge was noted, resulting in the challenge being time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:10:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=880830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1166 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785410</link>
      <description>Dispute concerns rectification of the register of members and the effect of limitation where alleged fraudulent share transfers occurred. The discoverability rule under limitation law postpones commencement until the mistake or fraud is discovered or could have been discovered with reasonable diligence; this doctrine was applied to hold that once a party knew antecedent facts enabling legal action, limitation begins, and ongoing awareness from 2006 and actions in 2011 meant limitation had commenced. Reliance on authority clarifying that the postponement does not cover all frauds or concealments that do not suppress knowledge was noted, resulting in the challenge being time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>