<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1169 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785413</link>
    <description>Section 28AAA recovery of export incentive scrip benefits requires a prior determination by the competent licensing authority that the scrip was wrongly issued or illegally obtained; customs authorities cannot independently question its validity. Rejection of declared export value also requires reasoned rejection followed by the prescribed sequential valuation method. A distinction between dry coconut and copra did not establish a legally sustainable misdeclaration or justify reassessment. Without valid rejection of value, drawback curtailment, confiscation, and penalties lacked foundation. The adjudication order was set aside and the appeals succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 12:32:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=880827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1169 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785413</link>
      <description>Section 28AAA recovery of export incentive scrip benefits requires a prior determination by the competent licensing authority that the scrip was wrongly issued or illegally obtained; customs authorities cannot independently question its validity. Rejection of declared export value also requires reasoned rejection followed by the prescribed sequential valuation method. A distinction between dry coconut and copra did not establish a legally sustainable misdeclaration or justify reassessment. Without valid rejection of value, drawback curtailment, confiscation, and penalties lacked foundation. The adjudication order was set aside and the appeals succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>