<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1174 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785418</link>
    <description>Retroactive amendment to procedural limitation was applied to show cause notices issued before the amendment date, requiring adjudication within one year from the retroactive operative date; notices adjudicated after that period were treated as time-barred and vacated. The tribunal followed higher court rulings upholding retroactivity and dismissal of departmental challenges, resulting in allowance of appeals. Secondary issues noted include reassessment versus self-assessment, recovery of duties, admissibility of electronic records and compliance with statutory record-keeping, and consequences for mis-declaration including penalty and confiscation, though these did not survive the limitation bar.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 15:54:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=880822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1174 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785418</link>
      <description>Retroactive amendment to procedural limitation was applied to show cause notices issued before the amendment date, requiring adjudication within one year from the retroactive operative date; notices adjudicated after that period were treated as time-barred and vacated. The tribunal followed higher court rulings upholding retroactivity and dismissal of departmental challenges, resulting in allowance of appeals. Secondary issues noted include reassessment versus self-assessment, recovery of duties, admissibility of electronic records and compliance with statutory record-keeping, and consequences for mis-declaration including penalty and confiscation, though these did not survive the limitation bar.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>