<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1184 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785428</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail granted in a customs-smuggling prosecution was set aside because the impugned order did not show consideration of the complainant&#039;s written objections. Given the serious allegations of gold smuggling, the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, with directions to hear both sides again and consider the complainant&#039;s objections and any further submissions. The effect was to require a reconsideration of the bail request on a proper hearing record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:10:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=880812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1184 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785428</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail granted in a customs-smuggling prosecution was set aside because the impugned order did not show consideration of the complainant&#039;s written objections. Given the serious allegations of gold smuggling, the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, with directions to hear both sides again and consider the complainant&#039;s objections and any further submissions. The effect was to require a reconsideration of the bail request on a proper hearing record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>