<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (5) TMI 13 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49600</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, affirming the Agricultural Income-tax Officer&#039;s jurisdiction to revise his order under section 26 of the Bihar Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1938. Additionally, the Court ruled that income from the zarpeshgi lease was taxable as agricultural income under the Act. The appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 22:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (5) TMI 13 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49600</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, affirming the Agricultural Income-tax Officer&#039;s jurisdiction to revise his order under section 26 of the Bihar Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1938. Additionally, the Court ruled that income from the zarpeshgi lease was taxable as agricultural income under the Act. The appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>