https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466073 Cancellation of a fair price shop licence without conducting a full-fledged inquiry was contested; the note emphasises the necessity of impleading a person appointed as a subsequent allottee during pendency because absence of a necessary party vitiates proceedings, and non-impleader can lead to dismissal. It records that appointment of a new dealer during appeal made that allottee a necessary party, and that failure to include that party in High Court proceedings justified quashing the impugned order and allowing the appeal on that ground. en-us Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jan 2026 19:39:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466073 Cancellation of a fair price shop licence without conducting a full-fledged inquiry was contested; the note emphasises the necessity of impleading a person appointed as a subsequent allottee during pendency because absence of a necessary party vitiates proceedings, and non-impleader can lead to dismissal. It records that appointment of a new dealer during appeal made that allottee a necessary party, and that failure to include that party in High Court proceedings justified quashing the impugned order and allowing the appeal on that ground. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466073