https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466075 Transfer of longstanding share dispute involved alleged fraudulent transfer, oppression and mismanagement; foreign jurisdiction principles for movables and conflict with a foreign judgment were held to preclude relief that would contradict the settled foreign outcome, and executed transfer forms were treated as acquiescence, barring reversal. Allegations of ouster and mismanagement were treated as past, not subsisting, and tainted by delay and laches, undermining equitable relief. Tribunal declined substantive relief on those grounds but directed appointment of a retired High Court judge as non-executive chairman for one year; parties to propose names within one week. en-us Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Jan 2026 10:18:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466075 Transfer of longstanding share dispute involved alleged fraudulent transfer, oppression and mismanagement; foreign jurisdiction principles for movables and conflict with a foreign judgment were held to preclude relief that would contradict the settled foreign outcome, and executed transfer forms were treated as acquiescence, barring reversal. Allegations of ouster and mismanagement were treated as past, not subsisting, and tainted by delay and laches, undermining equitable relief. Tribunal declined substantive relief on those grounds but directed appointment of a retired High Court judge as non-executive chairman for one year; parties to propose names within one week. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466075