https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466077 A request to enforce an earlier preliminary inquiry order and to initiate proceedings under Section 340 CrPC could not be pursued after the Supreme Court directed that the Company Law Board decide the company petition and the Section 340 application, and stated that the High Court need not continue with the criminal miscellaneous proceedings. The supervening direction displaced further action on the earlier High Court order, which could not be independently enforced in that forum. The controversy was therefore required to be addressed before the forum identified by the Supreme Court, leaving no maintainable contempt proceeding before the High Court. en-us Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jan 2026 19:39:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466077 A request to enforce an earlier preliminary inquiry order and to initiate proceedings under Section 340 CrPC could not be pursued after the Supreme Court directed that the Company Law Board decide the company petition and the Section 340 application, and stated that the High Court need not continue with the criminal miscellaneous proceedings. The supervening direction displaced further action on the earlier High Court order, which could not be independently enforced in that forum. The controversy was therefore required to be addressed before the forum identified by the Supreme Court, leaving no maintainable contempt proceeding before the High Court. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466077