https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466080 Maintainability of writ petitions in presence of an alternative statutory revisional remedy was addressed; the HC abstained from exercising writ jurisdiction because a revisional remedy under the Customs statute exists, and conferred liberty to invoke that revisional jurisdiction. The court directed that if revision is filed within two weeks it shall be entertained notwithstanding limitation, requiring the appellate authority to decide the revision within six months; this constitutes a directed condonation of delay to enable adjudication of the statutory revision while refusing immediate writ relief. en-us Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jan 2026 19:39:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466080 Maintainability of writ petitions in presence of an alternative statutory revisional remedy was addressed; the HC abstained from exercising writ jurisdiction because a revisional remedy under the Customs statute exists, and conferred liberty to invoke that revisional jurisdiction. The court directed that if revision is filed within two weeks it shall be entertained notwithstanding limitation, requiring the appellate authority to decide the revision within six months; this constitutes a directed condonation of delay to enable adjudication of the statutory revision while refusing immediate writ relief. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466080