<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (5) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49589</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed an appeal regarding whether payments to an insurance company for policy premiums constituted deductible expenditure under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The Court held that the payments were contingent liabilities rather than actual expenditure, as money was merely set aside with trustees/insurance company for potential annuity purchases but could be returned if not utilized. The Court distinguished between actual existing liabilities and contingent arrangements, ruling that deductible expenditure must be towards presently existing liabilities, not future contingent ones. The Calcutta HC&#039;s decision was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 18:47:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (5) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49589</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed an appeal regarding whether payments to an insurance company for policy premiums constituted deductible expenditure under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The Court held that the payments were contingent liabilities rather than actual expenditure, as money was merely set aside with trustees/insurance company for potential annuity purchases but could be returned if not utilized. The Court distinguished between actual existing liabilities and contingent arrangements, ruling that deductible expenditure must be towards presently existing liabilities, not future contingent ones. The Calcutta HC&#039;s decision was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>