<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1519 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466089</link>
    <description>An order rejecting a statutory request is unsustainable when relevant contentions are not considered on merits. The Karnataka HC held that the authority had not dealt with the petitioner&#039;s pleas on condonation of delay, genuine hardship, or the asserted effect of Section 105(3) of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 read with the Fourth Schedule, and therefore the rejection could not be sustained. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law, with rival contentions left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 13:09:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=880689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1519 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466089</link>
      <description>An order rejecting a statutory request is unsustainable when relevant contentions are not considered on merits. The Karnataka HC held that the authority had not dealt with the petitioner&#039;s pleas on condonation of delay, genuine hardship, or the asserted effect of Section 105(3) of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 read with the Fourth Schedule, and therefore the rejection could not be sustained. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law, with rival contentions left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>