<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (5) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49586</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, affirming that the Excess Profits Tax Officer has the discretion under rule 12(1) to disallow excessive bonus payments as deductions. The Court also ruled that the company&#039;s obligation to pay bonuses without deducting excess profits tax was not valid, as the payments were deemed unreasonably high and unnecessary. The appeal was dismissed, and costs were awarded against the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 10:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (5) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49586</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, affirming that the Excess Profits Tax Officer has the discretion under rule 12(1) to disallow excessive bonus payments as deductions. The Court also ruled that the company&#039;s obligation to pay bonuses without deducting excess profits tax was not valid, as the payments were deemed unreasonably high and unnecessary. The appeal was dismissed, and costs were awarded against the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>