<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (3) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49582</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, denying the association&#039;s exemption from the Business Profits Tax Act and determining that the Rs. 6,00,000 payment by the Government of Bengal was not a subsidy but for the association&#039;s business expenses and services rendered. The Court emphasized that the payments were for business purposes, not benevolent grants, affirming the High Court&#039;s analysis of the agreement terms and association&#039;s functions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (3) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49582</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, denying the association&#039;s exemption from the Business Profits Tax Act and determining that the Rs. 6,00,000 payment by the Government of Bengal was not a subsidy but for the association&#039;s business expenses and services rendered. The Court emphasized that the payments were for business purposes, not benevolent grants, affirming the High Court&#039;s analysis of the agreement terms and association&#039;s functions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>