<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (12) TMI 341 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466068</link>
    <description>A foreign decree is executable where the foreign court had competent jurisdiction over a resident defendant who was served with summons and expressly submitted to that forum by written consent. The decree was treated as a judgment on merits because it arose from a real dispute and not from mere default. Allegations of breach of natural justice and fraud failed for want of particulars and evidence, and the presumption of fair foreign procedure was not displaced. The objection based on non-certification of the decree copy was also rejected as it was not raised before the executing court. The decree was therefore held executable, and the challenge to its execution failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 14:48:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=880618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (12) TMI 341 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466068</link>
      <description>A foreign decree is executable where the foreign court had competent jurisdiction over a resident defendant who was served with summons and expressly submitted to that forum by written consent. The decree was treated as a judgment on merits because it arose from a real dispute and not from mere default. Allegations of breach of natural justice and fraud failed for want of particulars and evidence, and the presumption of fair foreign procedure was not displaced. The objection based on non-certification of the decree copy was also rejected as it was not raised before the executing court. The decree was therefore held executable, and the challenge to its execution failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>