<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (4) TMI 7 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49580</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the HC&#039;s decision, ruling that the widows could not be assessed as an &quot;association of persons&quot; under the Income-tax Act, as they did not engage in a joint enterprise to earn income. The SC also determined that income from the property should be assessed separately for each widow under Section 9(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, as their shares were definite and ascertainable. The appeals by the Commissioner of Income-tax were dismissed, affirming the separate assessment of the widows&#039; income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (4) TMI 7 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49580</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the HC&#039;s decision, ruling that the widows could not be assessed as an &quot;association of persons&quot; under the Income-tax Act, as they did not engage in a joint enterprise to earn income. The SC also determined that income from the property should be assessed separately for each widow under Section 9(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, as their shares were definite and ascertainable. The appeals by the Commissioner of Income-tax were dismissed, affirming the separate assessment of the widows&#039; income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>