<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transponder service fees dispute: whether payments constitute royalty under India-UK tax treaty, tribunal denies treaty royalty status</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96259</link>
    <description>Taxability of transponder service fees was addressed as whether such payments constitute royalty under the India-UK tax treaty, with the tribunal applying the principle that unilateral domestic amendments do not alter treaty definitions; accordingly the amended domestic definition of process/royalty was not imported into the treaty, and payments for transponder services were held not to fall within the treaty definition of royalty, disposing of the withholding obligation under the treaty analysis. The tribunal upheld the appellate authoritys rejection of revenues contention and did not adjudicate separate issues on fees for technical services or business profits due to absence of contested grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 11:07:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 11:07:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=880572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Transponder service fees dispute: whether payments constitute royalty under India-UK tax treaty, tribunal denies treaty royalty status</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96259</link>
      <description>Taxability of transponder service fees was addressed as whether such payments constitute royalty under the India-UK tax treaty, with the tribunal applying the principle that unilateral domestic amendments do not alter treaty definitions; accordingly the amended domestic definition of process/royalty was not imported into the treaty, and payments for transponder services were held not to fall within the treaty definition of royalty, disposing of the withholding obligation under the treaty analysis. The tribunal upheld the appellate authoritys rejection of revenues contention and did not adjudicate separate issues on fees for technical services or business profits due to absence of contested grounds.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 11:07:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>