<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Amalgamation assessment: Predecessor&#039;s pre-merger income cannot be clubbed with successor&#039;s assessment in a single order; reassessment invalidated.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96258</link>
    <description>Amalgamation assessment: the commentary concludes that income and disallowances of a predecessor for a period prior to amalgamation cannot be merged into a single reassessment order framed against the successor; such pre-amalgamation amounts must be assessed separately and, if at all, only under representative assessment provisions, and reliance on decisions about notices in the name of non-existent entities does not justify clubbing the predecessors income with the successors in one composite assessment. The revenues reassessment attempts to add predecessor period income in a single order are therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 11:05:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 11:05:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=880571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Amalgamation assessment: Predecessor&#039;s pre-merger income cannot be clubbed with successor&#039;s assessment in a single order; reassessment invalidated.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96258</link>
      <description>Amalgamation assessment: the commentary concludes that income and disallowances of a predecessor for a period prior to amalgamation cannot be merged into a single reassessment order framed against the successor; such pre-amalgamation amounts must be assessed separately and, if at all, only under representative assessment provisions, and reliance on decisions about notices in the name of non-existent entities does not justify clubbing the predecessors income with the successors in one composite assessment. The revenues reassessment attempts to add predecessor period income in a single order are therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 11:05:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>