<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (3) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49577</link>
    <description>The note addresses whether managing-agency commission income remained HUF income after a partition. It states that Hindu law permits an effective oral and memorandum-recorded partition that severs joint family ownership and converts joint interests into separate shares; such division determines the source of income for income-tax purposes based on ownership and enjoyment. The Partnership Act or practical impracticability of admitting all members as partners does not prevent a valid Hindu-law partition. Consequently, once members received definite shares in the commissions, the income could not be treated as that of a continuing HUF.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (3) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49577</link>
      <description>The note addresses whether managing-agency commission income remained HUF income after a partition. It states that Hindu law permits an effective oral and memorandum-recorded partition that severs joint family ownership and converts joint interests into separate shares; such division determines the source of income for income-tax purposes based on ownership and enjoyment. The Partnership Act or practical impracticability of admitting all members as partners does not prevent a valid Hindu-law partition. Consequently, once members received definite shares in the commissions, the income could not be treated as that of a continuing HUF.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>