<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Admissibility of inquiry statements and electronic printouts in customs adjudication requires witness examination and cross-examination before reliance</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96249</link>
    <description>Proceedings under the Customs Act require that statements recorded during inquiry be preceded by examination of the maker as a witness and a judicial determination by the adjudicating authority on admissibility; once admitted, the maker must be made available for cross-examination, otherwise the statement lacks evidentiary relevance. Computer printouts and documentary reproductions are admissible only where procedural safeguards for their capture and Panchnama are satisfied; retracted section 108 statements without compliance with documentary reproduction procedure lack probative value. Failure to meet these evidentiary requirements undermines valuation re-determination and penalty imposition under the valuation rules, leading to quashing of such orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 10:46:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 10:46:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=880558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Admissibility of inquiry statements and electronic printouts in customs adjudication requires witness examination and cross-examination before reliance</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96249</link>
      <description>Proceedings under the Customs Act require that statements recorded during inquiry be preceded by examination of the maker as a witness and a judicial determination by the adjudicating authority on admissibility; once admitted, the maker must be made available for cross-examination, otherwise the statement lacks evidentiary relevance. Computer printouts and documentary reproductions are admissible only where procedural safeguards for their capture and Panchnama are satisfied; retracted section 108 statements without compliance with documentary reproduction procedure lack probative value. Failure to meet these evidentiary requirements undermines valuation re-determination and penalty imposition under the valuation rules, leading to quashing of such orders.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 10:46:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>