<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Approval of resolution plan including third-party land upheld where guarantor land treated as company asset, lease voided</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96244</link>
    <description>Approval of a resolution plan that treated specified third-party/guarantor land as assets of the corporate debtor and set aside a fraudulent, undervalued lease deed was upheld; the adjudicatory authoritys prior orders approving the plan and cancelling the lease were held to be final and binding, and consequential directions flowing from those approvals were sustained. Challenges that inclusion of third-party property exceeded the authority or was exclusively a civil remedy were rejected, and the appellate challenge was dismissed for lack of merit, preserving the operative effect of the resolution plan and avoidance of the preferential/fraudulent transaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 10:41:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 10:41:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=880552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Approval of resolution plan including third-party land upheld where guarantor land treated as company asset, lease voided</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96244</link>
      <description>Approval of a resolution plan that treated specified third-party/guarantor land as assets of the corporate debtor and set aside a fraudulent, undervalued lease deed was upheld; the adjudicatory authoritys prior orders approving the plan and cancelling the lease were held to be final and binding, and consequential directions flowing from those approvals were sustained. Challenges that inclusion of third-party property exceeded the authority or was exclusively a civil remedy were rejected, and the appellate challenge was dismissed for lack of merit, preserving the operative effect of the resolution plan and avoidance of the preferential/fraudulent transaction.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 10:41:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>