<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (2) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49574</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that interest received by a co-operative bank from fixed deposits constituted part of its business activities and was exempt from income tax under relevant notifications. The Court emphasized that such deposits were integral to the bank&#039;s operations and not merely surplus funds, overturning the High Court&#039;s decision. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and costs were awarded to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (2) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49574</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that interest received by a co-operative bank from fixed deposits constituted part of its business activities and was exempt from income tax under relevant notifications. The Court emphasized that such deposits were integral to the bank&#039;s operations and not merely surplus funds, overturning the High Court&#039;s decision. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and costs were awarded to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>