https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785327 Impleadment in liquidation proceedings under the insolvency regime was held to require an effective opportunity to be heard; the impugned order was quashed because it failed to consider impleadment and did not adjudicate the interlocutory application on its merits, resulting in revival of the original interlocutory application and a direction for fresh adjudication on merits with an opportunity for the appellant to be heard under Section 54 procedures. The consequence is that the appellants impleadment is to be treated as allowed and the NCLT is directed to decide the application afresh. en-us Fri, 24 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jan 2026 08:41:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785327 Impleadment in liquidation proceedings under the insolvency regime was held to require an effective opportunity to be heard; the impugned order was quashed because it failed to consider impleadment and did not adjudicate the interlocutory application on its merits, resulting in revival of the original interlocutory application and a direction for fresh adjudication on merits with an opportunity for the appellant to be heard under Section 54 procedures. The consequence is that the appellants impleadment is to be treated as allowed and the NCLT is directed to decide the application afresh. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 24 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785327