<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1095 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785339</link>
    <description>Subsection (2) requires that proceedings under the Customs Act follow subsection (1) procedural safeguards, meaning a person who makes a statement during inquiry must first be examined as a witness and the adjudicating authority must then form an opinion on admissibility; if admitted, the opposing party must be given opportunity for cross-examination, thereby giving such statements evidentiary relevance when procedure is complied with. Retracted statements recorded under section 108 and electronic email printouts without a panchnama fail the procedural requisites for admissibility under the statutory scheme, resulting in the revaluation and penalty orders being unsustainable and the appeals allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 08:41:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=880502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1095 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785339</link>
      <description>Subsection (2) requires that proceedings under the Customs Act follow subsection (1) procedural safeguards, meaning a person who makes a statement during inquiry must first be examined as a witness and the adjudicating authority must then form an opinion on admissibility; if admitted, the opposing party must be given opportunity for cross-examination, thereby giving such statements evidentiary relevance when procedure is complied with. Retracted statements recorded under section 108 and electronic email printouts without a panchnama fail the procedural requisites for admissibility under the statutory scheme, resulting in the revaluation and penalty orders being unsustainable and the appeals allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>