https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785347 Review jurisdiction is confined to the narrow grounds under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC and cannot be used to reargue the matter, fill gaps in the original pleadings, or introduce facts that were available earlier. The review application failed because it did not disclose an error apparent on the face of the record or any other permissible ground to reopen the order dismissing condonation of delay. The additional factual pleas raised in review were not part of the original condonation application, and the delay after obtaining the certified copy remained unexplained. The order dismissing condonation of delay was therefore left undisturbed. en-us Wed, 07 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jan 2026 08:41:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785347 Review jurisdiction is confined to the narrow grounds under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC and cannot be used to reargue the matter, fill gaps in the original pleadings, or introduce facts that were available earlier. The review application failed because it did not disclose an error apparent on the face of the record or any other permissible ground to reopen the order dismissing condonation of delay. The additional factual pleas raised in review were not part of the original condonation application, and the delay after obtaining the certified copy remained unexplained. The order dismissing condonation of delay was therefore left undisturbed. Case-Laws Benami Property Wed, 07 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785347