<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1132 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785376</link>
    <description>Dependent agent permanent establishment and characterisation of royalty receipts were in issue, but the petition was refused on procedural grounds: the application for condonation of delay was found insufficient for a 558-day delay, leading to dismissal of the petition and an order for costs of Rs.50,000. The Supreme Court affirmed the earlier High Court decision, with the determination on condonation being dispositive of the appeal and resulting directly in dismissal and cost liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 08:41:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=880465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1132 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785376</link>
      <description>Dependent agent permanent establishment and characterisation of royalty receipts were in issue, but the petition was refused on procedural grounds: the application for condonation of delay was found insufficient for a 558-day delay, leading to dismissal of the petition and an order for costs of Rs.50,000. The Supreme Court affirmed the earlier High Court decision, with the determination on condonation being dispositive of the appeal and resulting directly in dismissal and cost liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>