<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (5) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49560</link>
    <description>Income-tax under the statutory scheme is levied only on the total income of the previous year, while the annual Finance Act fixes the rate within that framework. The impugned proviso deemed excess dividends to arise out of undistributed profits of earlier years, but it did not also bring those profits into the total income of the relevant year. As a result, the charge operated outside the statutory basis for income-tax, because the amount taxed was not part of the assessed year&#039;s total income. The additional income-tax on excess dividends was therefore not validly charged, and the referred question was answered in the negative.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 20:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (5) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49560</link>
      <description>Income-tax under the statutory scheme is levied only on the total income of the previous year, while the annual Finance Act fixes the rate within that framework. The impugned proviso deemed excess dividends to arise out of undistributed profits of earlier years, but it did not also bring those profits into the total income of the relevant year. As a result, the charge operated outside the statutory basis for income-tax, because the amount taxed was not part of the assessed year&#039;s total income. The additional income-tax on excess dividends was therefore not validly charged, and the referred question was answered in the negative.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>