https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466064 The writ petition was treated as covered against the petitioner by an earlier judgment of the same Court, so relief was declined and the petition was dismissed without merits being examined. The petitioner was nonetheless allowed to file a reply to the show cause notice and raise year-specific objections, which the Adjudicating Authority was required to consider independently while passing final orders. Time was granted for filing the reply, preserving the petitioner's opportunity to contest the notice on those limited grounds. en-us Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Jan 2026 20:45:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466064 The writ petition was treated as covered against the petitioner by an earlier judgment of the same Court, so relief was declined and the petition was dismissed without merits being examined. The petitioner was nonetheless allowed to file a reply to the show cause notice and raise year-specific objections, which the Adjudicating Authority was required to consider independently while passing final orders. Time was granted for filing the reply, preserving the petitioner's opportunity to contest the notice on those limited grounds. Case-Laws GST Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466064