<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (5) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49558</link>
    <description>Whether additional tax under the proviso to paragraph B of Part I of the First Schedule to the Finance Act, 1951 applies when an assessee&#039;s total income is nil or a loss: the proviso operates as a rate provision dependent on &quot;total income&quot; as determined for income-tax purposes, so phrases like &quot;on the total income&quot; and &quot;profits liable to tax&quot; lack operative meaning where total income is nil or negative; the deeming rule treating excess dividends as from undistributed profits cannot supply a non-existent total income; consequently the proviso cannot be read as an independent charging provision and no additional tax is payable under it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 16:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (5) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49558</link>
      <description>Whether additional tax under the proviso to paragraph B of Part I of the First Schedule to the Finance Act, 1951 applies when an assessee&#039;s total income is nil or a loss: the proviso operates as a rate provision dependent on &quot;total income&quot; as determined for income-tax purposes, so phrases like &quot;on the total income&quot; and &quot;profits liable to tax&quot; lack operative meaning where total income is nil or negative; the deeming rule treating excess dividends as from undistributed profits cannot supply a non-existent total income; consequently the proviso cannot be read as an independent charging provision and no additional tax is payable under it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>