<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (5) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49557</link>
    <description>The managing agency commission under the agreement accrued only when it became due and payable at the end of the financial year; the clause fixing 3 1/2% on sales governed only computation of the amount. Reading the remuneration clause with the accrual clause, the Court held that no enforceable right or debt arose on each individual sale during the year. The income therefore accrued to the assessee company at year-end and not to the retiring managing agents on each sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 20:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (5) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49557</link>
      <description>The managing agency commission under the agreement accrued only when it became due and payable at the end of the financial year; the clause fixing 3 1/2% on sales governed only computation of the amount. Reading the remuneration clause with the accrual clause, the Court held that no enforceable right or debt arose on each individual sale during the year. The income therefore accrued to the assessee company at year-end and not to the retiring managing agents on each sale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>