<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Regarding GSTIN Cancelled suo-moto.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120726</link>
    <description>Retrospective suo motu cancellation of a supplier&#039;s GST registration does not automatically defeat a recipient&#039;s ITC claim if all Section 16 conditions were met at the time of supply; absence of an e way bill is a procedural lapse that may be cured by secondary evidence proving receipt and movement of goods, and compliance with payment conditions such as the 180 day rule is relevant to entitlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 18:54:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 06:35:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=880368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Regarding GSTIN Cancelled suo-moto.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120726</link>
      <description>Retrospective suo motu cancellation of a supplier&#039;s GST registration does not automatically defeat a recipient&#039;s ITC claim if all Section 16 conditions were met at the time of supply; absence of an e way bill is a procedural lapse that may be cured by secondary evidence proving receipt and movement of goods, and compliance with payment conditions such as the 180 day rule is relevant to entitlement.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 18:54:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>