<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (12) TMI 11 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49545</link>
    <description>Contractual commission on an employee&#039;s net profits is governed by the agreement&#039;s own computation formula; where the clause does not exclude excess profits tax, that tax is deductible before calculating the commission. By contrast, additional commission paid to branch managers and other employees under the excess profits tax regime is deductible only if it is objectively reasonable and necessary for the business, having regard to the services rendered. That assessment is primarily for the taxing authorities, and their factual finding of excessiveness cannot be displaced by reappreciation of evidence in advisory jurisdiction. The article distinguishes contractual construction from statutory deductibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2014 19:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (12) TMI 11 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49545</link>
      <description>Contractual commission on an employee&#039;s net profits is governed by the agreement&#039;s own computation formula; where the clause does not exclude excess profits tax, that tax is deductible before calculating the commission. By contrast, additional commission paid to branch managers and other employees under the excess profits tax regime is deductible only if it is objectively reasonable and necessary for the business, having regard to the services rendered. That assessment is primarily for the taxing authorities, and their factual finding of excessiveness cannot be displaced by reappreciation of evidence in advisory jurisdiction. The article distinguishes contractual construction from statutory deductibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>