<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1056 - GSTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785300</link>
    <description>Input tax credit benefit for flat buyers under Rule 128 was examined through the DGAP&#039;s quantified profiteering report. Documentary evidence of a memorandum of understanding showed that the developer had granted appropriate benefits or price reductions to allottees, resolving the dispute over passing on GST-related input tax credit benefits. The DGAP report was accepted, and the matter was closed in light of the settlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 08:49:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=880235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1056 - GSTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785300</link>
      <description>Input tax credit benefit for flat buyers under Rule 128 was examined through the DGAP&#039;s quantified profiteering report. Documentary evidence of a memorandum of understanding showed that the developer had granted appropriate benefits or price reductions to allottees, resolving the dispute over passing on GST-related input tax credit benefits. The DGAP report was accepted, and the matter was closed in light of the settlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>