<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1057 - GSTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785301</link>
    <description>Profiteering alleged in construction services related to failure to pass on input tax credit was quantified but subsequently remedied by the supplier who voluntarily passed an amount exceeding the computed commensurate benefit; as a result the investigation report was accepted and the complaint proceedings were closed with a finding that the supplier satisfied the statutory mandate under Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act and no further remedial action was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 08:49:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=880234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1057 - GSTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785301</link>
      <description>Profiteering alleged in construction services related to failure to pass on input tax credit was quantified but subsequently remedied by the supplier who voluntarily passed an amount exceeding the computed commensurate benefit; as a result the investigation report was accepted and the complaint proceedings were closed with a finding that the supplier satisfied the statutory mandate under Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act and no further remedial action was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>