<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessment under Section 153A relying on third-party WhatsApp evidence rejected; additions deleted on merits and precedent curtailed</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96215</link>
    <description>Assessment jurisdiction under search provisions cannot be assumed for unabated years based on third-party digital chats; the third-party WhatsApp material was unrelated, post-facto and not incriminating, consequently the addition was deleted. The revenue bears the onus to prove unrecorded consideration, and reliance on uncorroborated digital chats or &#039;dumb documents&#039; is impermissible, so the on-money addition failed on merits. Extrapolating modus operandi or materials from another entity or assessment year to make additions is legally unsound; such additions were deleted. Alleged penny stock contrivances lacking incriminating search material and documentary proof were likewise disallowed and revenue appeals dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 08:41:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 08:41:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=880161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessment under Section 153A relying on third-party WhatsApp evidence rejected; additions deleted on merits and precedent curtailed</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96215</link>
      <description>Assessment jurisdiction under search provisions cannot be assumed for unabated years based on third-party digital chats; the third-party WhatsApp material was unrelated, post-facto and not incriminating, consequently the addition was deleted. The revenue bears the onus to prove unrecorded consideration, and reliance on uncorroborated digital chats or &#039;dumb documents&#039; is impermissible, so the on-money addition failed on merits. Extrapolating modus operandi or materials from another entity or assessment year to make additions is legally unsound; such additions were deleted. Alleged penny stock contrivances lacking incriminating search material and documentary proof were likewise disallowed and revenue appeals dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 08:41:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>