<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (12) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49536</link>
    <description>A minor cannot be made a full partner under partnership law, though the minor may be admitted only to the benefits of partnership with the adult partners&#039; consent. The income-tax definition of &quot;partner&quot; does not enlarge contractual capacity or validate a deed that, on its face, treats the minor as having the same rights and liabilities as adult partners. Registration under section 26A must be based on the actual instrument executed, and the authorities cannot recast the deed into a different contract. The partnership deed was therefore not valid for registration, and the reference was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (12) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49536</link>
      <description>A minor cannot be made a full partner under partnership law, though the minor may be admitted only to the benefits of partnership with the adult partners&#039; consent. The income-tax definition of &quot;partner&quot; does not enlarge contractual capacity or validate a deed that, on its face, treats the minor as having the same rights and liabilities as adult partners. Registration under section 26A must be based on the actual instrument executed, and the authorities cannot recast the deed into a different contract. The partnership deed was therefore not valid for registration, and the reference was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>