<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (11) TMI 21 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49531</link>
    <description>Whether a decree comprising arrears of salary and compensation for wrongful termination attracts the statutory obligation of tax deduction at source was examined: the duty under Section 18 arises only where a payment is due as salary, and a decree merging salary and compensation converts recoverable amounts into a judgment debt not automatically subject to source deduction. Deduction under Section 46(5) requires a prior assessment and requisition. Execution must follow the tenor of the judgment and permit only Code of Civil Procedure adjustments such as set-off or competing claims; accordingly the employer could not deduct tax before payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (11) TMI 21 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49531</link>
      <description>Whether a decree comprising arrears of salary and compensation for wrongful termination attracts the statutory obligation of tax deduction at source was examined: the duty under Section 18 arises only where a payment is due as salary, and a decree merging salary and compensation converts recoverable amounts into a judgment debt not automatically subject to source deduction. Deduction under Section 46(5) requires a prior assessment and requisition. Execution must follow the tenor of the judgment and permit only Code of Civil Procedure adjustments such as set-off or competing claims; accordingly the employer could not deduct tax before payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>