<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1863 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466013</link>
    <description>Determination of assessable value centred on whether the agreed sale price between seller and buyer should be displaced by valuation under reasonable means or treated as a related-person transaction. The commentary concludes that absent evidence satisfying the mutuality or influence elements of the related person definition, the transaction value between seller and buyer must be accepted for assessment, and valuation under alternative valuation provisions is improper. Consequently, demands computed by adopting resale price differentials are unsustainable and ancillary issues including penalty and extended limitation become academic where primary valuation is decided in favour of the selling price.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 21:18:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=880102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1863 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466013</link>
      <description>Determination of assessable value centred on whether the agreed sale price between seller and buyer should be displaced by valuation under reasonable means or treated as a related-person transaction. The commentary concludes that absent evidence satisfying the mutuality or influence elements of the related person definition, the transaction value between seller and buyer must be accepted for assessment, and valuation under alternative valuation provisions is improper. Consequently, demands computed by adopting resale price differentials are unsustainable and ancillary issues including penalty and extended limitation become academic where primary valuation is decided in favour of the selling price.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>