<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (11) TMI 20 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49530</link>
    <description>Where a firm&#039;s business is discontinued, section 44 makes every person who was a partner at discontinuance jointly and severally liable to assessment under Chapter IV and directs that all provisions of Chapter IV apply so far as may be. The Article construes &quot;assessment&quot; to include the Chapter&#039;s machinery for determination and enforcement, including penalty provisions, and reasons that the phrase &quot;so far as may be&quot; excludes only provisions impossible by their nature to apply. Consequently penalties under section 28(1)(c) may be imposed after firm discontinuance on former partners; outcome favours the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 15:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (11) TMI 20 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49530</link>
      <description>Where a firm&#039;s business is discontinued, section 44 makes every person who was a partner at discontinuance jointly and severally liable to assessment under Chapter IV and directs that all provisions of Chapter IV apply so far as may be. The Article construes &quot;assessment&quot; to include the Chapter&#039;s machinery for determination and enforcement, including penalty provisions, and reasons that the phrase &quot;so far as may be&quot; excludes only provisions impossible by their nature to apply. Consequently penalties under section 28(1)(c) may be imposed after firm discontinuance on former partners; outcome favours the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>